It is illogical to be both an opponent of Donald Trump and a supporter of US soldiers on Danish soil.
Those who support the proposal for US military bases on Danish soil, including the surrender of sovereignty to the US, are to a large extent also those who oppose Donald Trump and shout that Denmark can no longer count on protection from the US. It is therefore illogical that they also support the bill that gives the US free rein to operate on Danish soil.
In the past, such a bill would be called submission to an occupying power. I find it hard to see what the difference is between the current Danish government’s view of the US military on Danish soil and the then Danish government’s view of the German military on Danish soil in 1940. The media coverage is also roughly the same. Back then, the Germans also came to ‘protect us’ and Hitler was a ‘man of peace’, according to the Danish press.
If only it was at least ‘only’ the US we are now being occupied by. The problem is that the US itself is occupied by Israel in a narrow sense and by a Zionist mafia of rich people in a broader sense. It is therefore not entirely wrong to equate American and Israeli soldiers, as they are subject to the same political and religious leadership.
This means that the Danish government and all members of the Danish Parliament (with the exception of Enhedslisten, Alternativet and non-attached member Theresa Scavenius) now support Denmark surrendering to the US and Israel without a fight.
If the Danish military cannot protect Denmark, why do we even have a Danish military? Or is the Danish military already occupied by the US and Israel?
Related: