Here I describe seven stages in the great corona story. Stage 5 is the present, while the last two stages are a forecast of the future.
This post is purely an expression of my personal opinion on the matter, although I think I argue my theory quite objectively.
Stage 1: Discovery of new disease, new virus
Stage 1 was conducted in collaboration between China and the WHO.
The primary claim was that a new, contagious and deadly disease had broken out in China.
The secondary claim was that a novel coronavirus had been discovered.
The tertiary claim was that infection with the novel coronavirus was also the cause of the new disease, which was named COVID-19.
Stage 2: Fear-mongering communication
The approach was to first communicate fear-mongering messages and narratives that the hungry and obedient press passed on uncritically to the people of the world.
In this communication, no one questioned the basic claims made by the WHO and China about corona, even though the credibility of the information could rightly be questioned by looking at funding and governance.
Stage 3: The triumph of fear over science
The consequence of the widespread fear was that scientific investigation of the basic assumptions was skipped. Thus, no scientific research of a sufficiently high level of evidence was carried out that documented either the existence of a truly new disease (including thorough differential diagnostics) or infection with the novel coronavirus as the cause of this new disease (i.e. controlled transmission experiments). As a result of fear-mongering, this research was seen as unnecessary and ethically indefensible. This is an example of false ethics constructed through persuasive communication.
Instead, they jumped to hypothesized solutions to fear that were sold to the public via more persuasive communication as effective, necessary and safe: distance, face masks, hand sanitizer, lockdowns and new turbo vaccines.
The fear, propaganda and the related yearning for a vaccine led to clinical trials of the new vaccines being halted prematurely, important endpoints being omitted, and hasty, extrapolated conclusions being drawn about both efficacy and safety of these new injections. At the same time, all other interventions, including vitamin D supplements, were ignored and certainly not directly compared to the vaccines.
Stage 4: Misuse of science
Instead of real efficacy research, the effectiveness of the new vaccines was documented in observational studies with two major sources of error.
The first major source of error is the so-called healthy vaccinee bias, which means that people who are initially healthier are more likely to accept offers of recommended vaccination. This means that differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated people in, for example, the prevalence of the COVID-19 disease construct (i.e. positive PCR test and some other symptom) are not necessarily due to the vaccine, but rather other differences between the two groups of people.
The other major source of error is that when it comes to mass vaccination, in Denmark’s case over 90% of the population received the vaccine, there is no real control group, not even in a population study without randomized intervention. This led the authorities to instead compare those who had received the latest booster with those who had only received the previous shots. This was used as a proxy for vaccine effectiveness, although it is also subject to healthy vaccinee bias. By continuing to offer the same group (those who were already vaccinated) another shot, the overall group is self-selected into the ‘healthy’ (those who continue with the next booster) and the ‘unhealthy’ (those who do not continue).
In addition, one reason for not taking the next shot could be that they had experienced significant side effects from the previous shot. Thus, what was presented as evidence of the beneficial effects of booster shots could actually mask the harmful effects of the previous shots in those who did not take the booster.
Stage 5: Unscientific criticism of adverse effects
We are now in this stage where a significant proportion of the population is convinced that the corona vaccines have very serious and very common adverse effects.
They have come to this counter-conviction by looking at the numbers of reported side effects in combination with case histories of people who have experienced serious, chronic illness after the coronavirus vaccine.
The US even has a Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who became known as a vaccine critic during corona fascism, and who many now have high hopes for.
However, just as the authorities’ claims that the coronavirus vaccines are proven effective and safe do not hold water scientifically, the critics’ claims to the contrary do not hold water scientifically either. The critics also base their opinions on empirical evidence derived from scientific methods that cannot convincingly say anything about the efficacy of vaccines.
In terms of communication, this creates a situation that is favorable to vaccine proponents, as the obedient press simply has to let the non-scientifically educated make confident statements about the danger of vaccines, while the scientifically based critics continue to be ignored in the public debate and health education. Strong claims about the harmful effects of vaccines in the countercurrent will serve as evidence to the contrary in the mainstream.
We now find ourselves in a classic Hegelian dialectic with someone like Danish Professor Christine Stabell Benn in the role of gentle mediator in the synthesis, maintaining the perception that COVID-19 was a health event, while it was actually a political event for a completely different agenda that no one can expect an expert in medicine to have sufficient knowledge of, but by allowing experts in medicine instead of experts in propaganda to analyze and speak out, the desired narrative is maintained and created via what on the surface looks like criticism and disagreement.
Stage 6: Ridicule of deep criticism
So far, deep, political and scientific criticism of the corona case has been ignored in the mainstream.
This will continue to be the case unless there is very strong support for one or more dissidents. The system of power has absolutely no intention of dealing with this criticism through democratic, open debate on the criticism. It should preferably be ignored and silenced. But if at some point it can no longer do that because it’s too much pressure, the strategy is to expose the critics as ridiculous in other areas. The aim is to destroy the critics’ credibility among the general public.
That’s one of the purposes of Donald Trump as president. He, and the global movement he fronts, acts as a magnet for corona critics who can then be criticized for supporting Trump, who everyone in the mainstream knows is a ridiculous, dangerous clown.
This is also why crazy conspiracy theories like Flat Earth have been propagated so massively and professionally, as these narratives also act as bait for the open, critical mind.
We also see preparations for this stage in the form of criminalization of speech, just as confrontational criticism will be interpreted by police and courts as threats or harassment.
Stage 7: All genuine resistance is drowned
In the final stage, all deep, objective criticism of the system will be drowned – partly through the power system’s deliberate dissemination of an increasingly gigantic amount of increasingly well-produced false conspiracy theories, including via AI – and partly through the power system’s deliberate launch of new, major threats in the mainstream. This will culminate in war in Europe between the EU and Russia/China, while most people are blind to the deep power that controls both sides in that conflict as well.
It will thus be extremely difficult for searching souls to find the objective system criticism, as it is drowned in a sea of fake news and madness. It will also be difficult to get people to see the relevance of evaluating a historical event like corona, when it is no longer coronavirus, but evil Putin that the hungry and obedient press reminds us every day that we should be afraid of.
Relatet: