The Virus Ship as a Crime Scene and the WHO as a Terrorist Organisation

The virus ship is widely regarded as the place where the current hantavirus outbreak began – resulting in massive, one-sided media coverage. However, one could also view the ship as a crime scene and the entire operation as organised crime.

In a fair and truth-seeking world, both possibilities would be investigated, rather than fixating on a single explanation without examining the evidence for alternative explanations. We saw the same thing happen in the wake of the events in the US on 11 September 2001, when politicians, authorities and the media also quickly settled on a single narrative. The extremely rapid pace at which the investigation reached a crystal-clear conclusion should, in itself, give rise to suspicion that this is in fact a completely different kind of operation. Both with 9/11 and now with the hantavirus ship.

With regard to the virus ship, the first priority is to verify the information about the sequence of events. What do we actually know about the people who are alleged to have fallen ill or died from hantavirus? This requires a proper investigation rather than blind faith in press releases from news agencies.

Next, the ship itself should be examined as a potential crime scene. If people have indeed died on board the ship, there may be traces of whatever killed them, which need not necessarily be hantavirus. For example, there are biological weapons that can cause the same symptoms of severe lung disease. The technical evidence may then lead to suspicions about specific perpetrators.

Everyone on board the ship should be interviewed, including Jake Rosmarin. What exactly did they observe? Who instructed Jake Rosmarin on what to say in the infamous video?

These are just a few examples of the investigations that ought to be carried out right now, but which I am 99.99% certain will be completely ignored by those with the authority to do so. This is because it would mean treating the WHO, key figures and their collaborators as a terrorist organisation, and that is a taboo subject. This does not mean that everyone in the WHO and similar organisations is a criminal. It simply means that clever criminals infiltrate organisations such as the WHO, which have the means and motive to carry out this type of terrorist attack from a position where they are effectively, and in some cases also formally in legal terms (via UN status), immune from investigation.

There is no reason to assume that all criminals and all terrorists are stupid. On the contrary, it can be a highly destructive assumption to close one’s mind to all possibilities.

Related: